The DEP Application and Permit data will contain information about the different types of applications approved and permits issued on a regular basis. For the latest information, please refer to the Water and Sewer Permits dataset.

The data tables summarize the turbidity values, coliform, fluoride and chlorine found at sides in distribution each month.

Routine wastewater treatment plant monitoring results from 1987-Present

Routine stream monitoring results from 1987-Present.

The DEP Application and Permit data will contain information about the different types of applications approved and permits issued on a regular basis.

A brief history of water consumption in the New York City Water Supply System (Based on New York City Census population)

This dataset provides the location of spray showers under the jurisdiction of NYC Parks. For more information about spray showers, visit https://www.nycgovparks.org/facilities/sprayshowers

Data Dictionary: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q-MxMTrsE46Vdy-vea5lxCok8xD3Nd4zIvEI2KYgm08/edit?usp=sharing

The data tables provides a monthly roll up of key parameters at Wastewater treatment plants including SPEDES permit requirements

Site descriptions for all hydrological, keypoint, limnological, and wastewater treatment plant samples collected from 1984-present

NYC Green Infrastructure Program initiatives. Green infrastructure (GI) collects stormwater from streets, sidewalks, and other hard surfaces before it can enter the sewer system or cause local flooding. The GI practice data contained in this dataset includes the location, program area, status, and type of GI.

Please visit nyc.gov/dep/gimap to view the DEP Green Infrastructure Map.

Routine aqueduct, elevation tap, and basin elevation monitoring results from 1987-Present

Each record is either an individual drinking fountain or multiple drinking fountains that are attached to each other. NYC Parks created the dataset using collector for arcgis. All outdoor drinking fountains in parks were collected and a rigorous QA/QC process followed. In addition to the GPS coordinates the dataset includes descriptions of its physical environment and attributes about the drinking fountain itself.

User guide: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1whu6gzwBbinNuoBx6FLpaaGOy4cdecOrjRdJEsHwJn8

Data Dictionary: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1s7VSUHDJsGcHNghzllmdFgdwEMX2Zps_ygqSMMzfVgo

This dataset captures all water features within NYC Parks. It combines the State’s hydrography layer with known water fountains. Made for cartographic purposes, the attribute data isn’t as maintained as the geometry.

User guide: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1A7KhVk3LW_IKPHYfYUNAHSPgsVAJb1Chk3ZICtVwDsI
Data Dictionary: https://drive.google.com/open?id=124PsGwqsgf1cW2eWnEEjdO3cojoRtloAh3r37eTAXAM

Data collected to fulfill the requirements of the SWTR (Surface Water Treatment Rule) and FAD (Filtration Avoidance Determination). Data is collected via grab sampling, analysis, LIMS data capture and reporting. Each record represents either a four hour turbidity result, a 24 hour average turbidty result, or a daily fecal coliform result from DEL18DT (Delaware Shaft 18 downtake). Data is used to monitor compliance with the requirements above. There are no limitations for the data.

Qualifiers, notes, and additional information regarding the sample data provided or omitted.

Routine reservoir monitoring results from 1984-Present

Harbor water sampling information

Qualifiers, notes, and additional information regarding the sample data provided or omitted.

Qualifiers, notes, and additional information regarding the sample data provided or omitted.

Qualifiers, notes, and additional information regarding the sample data provided or omitted.

Tree Canopy (TC) Assessment metrics for New York City. This dataset consists of TC metrics summarized to several different sets of geographic base layers. The metrics presented in this table are based on 2010 high resolution land cover dataset.

The TC Assessment is a top-down approach to analyzing the forest. Its purpose is to integrate high resolution land cover data with other GIS datasets to produce a set of detailed metrics on the forest that allow decision makers to know how much tree canopy currently exists (termed Existing TC) and amount of land where is it biophysically feasible to establish tree canopy on (termed Possible TC).

Existing TC is determined by extracting all features classified as tree canopy from a high resolution land cover dataset. Possible TC is determined by identifying land where canopy could possibly exist. Possible TC in a GIS context is determined by overlaying high resolution land cover with cadastral and planimetric datasets to include building polygons and road polygons.

Possible TC is queried out from this overlay and consists of all land that was not existing canopy, not water, not a building, and not a road. Possible TC is further divided into two subcategories: Possible-impervious and Possible-vegetation. Possible-impervious consists of all impervious land that, through modification, could support tree canopy. Examples of such features are parking lots, driveways (through overhanging coverage) and playgrounds. Possible-vegetation consists of all land that is low-lying vegetation, primarily grass or shrubs, which could conceivably be converted to support tree canopy. Examples of such features include residential lawns and playing fields. TC metrics do not serve to address the issues of where it is socially desirable or financially feasible to plant trees. Rather, the TC metrics serve as the basis for beginning to form answers to these questions.

TC metrics are presented in the attribute table as both absolute area (in map units) and relative area (percentage of land area) per parcel. For example, an Existing TC Area (TC_E_A) value of 13,677 and an Existing TC Percentage (TC_E_P) of 21.8 indicate that for the parcel in question the area of Existing TC is 13,677 (in map units) and 21.8% of that feature is tree canopy. This assessment was completed by the University of Vermont's Spatial Analysis Laboratory with funding from National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council (NUCFAC) and the National Science Fundation (NSF) and in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service's Northern Research Station.

The TC Assessment protocols were developed by the USDA Forest Service's Northern Research Station and the University of Vermont's Spatial Analysis Laboratory in collaboration with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources. TC assessments have been conducted for numerous communities throughout the U.S. where the results have been instrumental in helping to establishing TC goals.

GIS data: Boundaries of Boroughs (water areas included).

All previously released versions of this data are available at BYTES of the BIG APPLE- Archive

GIS data: Community Districts (Water areas included)

Community Districts are mandated by the city charter to review and monitor quality of life issues for New York City (NYC) neighborhoods. NYC is currently comprised of 59 community districts. The first byte is a borough code and the second and third bytes are the community district number. There are also 12 Joint Interest Areas (JIAs). The JIAs are major parks and airports and are not contained within any community district. This dataset is being provided by the Department of City Planning (DCP) for informational purposes only. DCP does not warranty the completeness, accuracy, content, or fitness for any particular purpose or use of the dataset, nor are any such warranties to be implied or inferred with respect to the dataset as furnished on the website. DCP and the City are not liable for any deficiencies in the completeness, accuracy, content, or fitness for any particular purpose or use the dataset, or applications utilizing the dataset, provided by any third party.

All previously released versions of this data are available at BYTES of the BIG APPLE- Archive

A 6-in resolution 8-class land cover dataset derived from the 2017 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data capture. This dataset was developed as part of an updated urban tree canopy assessment and therefore represents a ''top-down" mapping perspective in which tree canopy overhanging features is assigned to the tree canopy class. The eight land cover classes mapped were: (1) Tree Canopy, (2) Grass\Shrubs, (3) Bare Soil, (4) Water, (5) Buildings, (6) Roads, (7) Other Impervious, and (8) Railroads. The primary sources used to derive this land cover layer were 2017 LiDAR (1-ft post spacing) and 2016 4-band orthoimagery (0.5-ft resolution). Object based image analysis was used to automate land-cover features using LiDAR point clouds and derivatives, orthoimagery, and vector GIS datasets --
City Boundary (2017, NYC DoITT)
Buildings (2017, NYC DoITT)
Hydrography (2014, NYC DoITT)
LiDAR Hydro Breaklines (2017, NYC DoITT)
Transportation Structures (2014, NYC DoITT)
Roadbed (2014, NYC DoITT)
Road Centerlines (2014, NYC DoITT)
Railroads (2014, NYC DoITT)
Green Roofs (date unknown, NYC Parks)
Parking Lots (2014, NYC DoITT)
Parks (2016, NYC Parks)
Sidewalks (2014, NYC DoITT)
Synthetic Turf (2018, NYC Parks)
Wetlands (2014, NYC Parks)
Shoreline (2014, NYC DoITT)
Plazas (2014, NYC DoITT)
Utility Poles (2014, ConEdison via NYCEM)
Athletic Facilities (2017, NYC Parks)

For the purposes of classification, only vegetation > 8 ft were classed as Tree Canopy. Vegetation below 8 ft was classed as Grass/Shrub.

To learn more about this dataset, visit the interactive "Understanding the 2017 New York City LiDAR Capture" Story Map -- https://maps.nyc.gov/lidar/2017/
Please see the following link for additional documentation on this dataset -- https://github.com/CityOfNewYork/nyc-geo-metadata/blob/master/Metadata/Metadata_LandCover.md

Attendance records for NYC Parks swimming beaches.

Data Dictionary here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rHuySYNqzeHvrRnqxf6rRVGGb0AyP92Z99gmpRHqVic/edit?usp=sharing